MiCasa, keep the housing search moving
MiCasa keeps housing search and landlord follow-up on one case, with a navigator reviewing proposed outreach. Follow a fictional client from housing requirements to a dated next action in this 1:48 demonstration.
Working prototype. The demonstration uses fictional clients and sample listings, with simulated outreach.
- Working prototype
- Fictional case
- Simulated outreach
- Problem
- A promising listing can leave important questions unanswered. The navigator needs to establish whether the home fits and keep track of the next follow-up.
- Engineering decision
- Keep missing listing evidence visible. Proposed outreach goes through policy checks and waits for a human decision before execution.
- Result
- A demonstrated case moves from a shortlist to a reviewed inquiry and a dated next action. Time savings still need to be measured.
- My role
- Sole engineer, independent housing-navigation prototype
- Source access
- Implementation and test evidence available for review. The video uses no real client records.
In this case study Features and engineering details
What it does
- Keep the stated needs attached
- Search by the requested cities and rent ceiling. The example also requires two bedrooms and step-free entry.
- Show what still needs checking
- Unknown access stays visible on the listing. A requested city with no returned listings remains visible too.
- Review outreach before execution
- The navigator reads the proposed message, then approves or denies it. The demonstration uses template drafts and simulated delivery.
- Give the reply a next action
- Record the reply and save a dated follow-up. The next person opening the case can see what remains to be done.
Demonstration and pitch
Recorded October 5, 2026. A 1:48 product demonstration and pitch. One fictional case, one approved simulated inquiry, and one denial. No real message or placement is claimed. English captions are available.
A lead worth following up
The example client has 45 days left on a voucher. Their search covers Santa Ana and Anaheim, with a $2,000 rent ceiling and at least two bedrooms. They need step-free entry.
Two homes meet the price and bedroom filters. The first still needs an access check. Anaheim returns no listings in this sample. Those gaps stay visible instead of becoming assumed matches.
A decision someone can review
Work this case prepares two inquiries. The navigator approves one and stops the other. The report separates the operator denial from the simulated send.
After a fictional landlord reply, the navigator saves a next action to confirm step-free access before offering a viewing. The due date stays with the case.
Try one workflow with two navigators
I would like a 60-minute working session with two housing navigators. Bring a task they do every week. We can use the same fictional cases in their current process and in MiCasa.
Compare active time and follow-up completeness. If the workflow saves useful time, we can agree on a small pilot. No agency adoption or measured time savings is claimed today.